Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | It’s Time for Israel to End Its Occupation and Hands Off Palestine - Powered by Blogger

For over 75 years, the land of Palestine has been under siege its people displaced, its homes bulldozed, its rights ignored. The modern state of Israel was created in 1948, but its expansion since then has come at a devastating cost to Palestinians. Generations have lived under occupation, denied basic rights, sovereignty, and even the ability to move freely.

It is no longer enough to simply call for a "two-state solution" or to ask Israel to treat Palestinians more fairly. The world must demand what is just and lawful: Israel must get its hands off Palestinian land, end its military occupation, and dismantle the illegal settlements that continue to grow in defiance of international law. This is not a matter of political preference it is a matter of international law and human dignity.

Violation of International Law
Israel continues to violate the Geneva Conventions and numerous United Nations Security Council resolutions. The construction of settlements in the West Bank is illegal. The blockade on Gaza is a form of collective punishment. The annexation of East Jerusalem is rejected by nearly every country on earth.

Despite this, global powers especially the United States turn a blind eye, funding and supporting a state that systematically displaces an indigenous population. No country should be above the law.

A Brutal Occupation Palestinians in Gaza live under siege conditions, without clean water, electricity, or medical care. Children grow up surrounded by rubble, drones, and fear. In the West Bank, checkpoints, night raids, and land theft are a daily reality. In East Jerusalem, families are forcibly evicted from homes their ancestors have lived in for generations.

This is not self-defense. This is not security. This is colonialism.

The World Must Take Action. Calling for peace while ignoring justice is hypocrisy. The only real path to peace is ending the occupation. Palestinians deserve more than sympathy they deserve freedom. And Israel must not be allowed to continue this occupation under the pretense of national security or ancient land claims.

Conclusion: Justice Is Not Extremism. Demanding that Israel end its occupation and return stolen land is not anti-Semitic. It is not hateful. It is a demand for justice, rooted in the same moral principles that opposed apartheid in South Africa or the occupation of East Timor.If Israel wants to be recognized as a democracy, it must start by respecting the rights of those it occupies. And if the world is serious about peace, it must stop funding and legitimizing a system of apartheid.

Palestine is not for sale, not for occupation, and not for erasure.
.
Justice begins with awareness.
Don’t be silent. Share this and support the right to live in peace
Let’s stand together for dignity, freedom, and human rights for everyone. 

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Why Israel Enforces Media Silence During Retaliation Iran's Missile Strike - Powered by Blogger

In today’s world of instant uploads, viral videos, and 24/7 news, you might wonder why Israel known for its robust democracy and free press would request a media blackout or ask the public not to post pictures and videos of missile strike locations, especially after retaliation attacks like the ones from Iran. The truth is, this isn't about hiding information. It’s about smart strategy, national safety, and staying ahead in a highly sensitive and dangerous situation..

Let’s start with the basics: security. If a missile lands in Israel and people immediately post photos or footage of the exact location, that’s extremely valuable intelligence for Iran. It helps them see if their missiles hit the right target or if they need to adjust the next round. By restricting the release of that information, Israel is making sure its enemies don’t get a free damage report..
|

Iran launches new wave of strikes against Israel.  Image from Al Jazeera English

Now imagine this: a video shows smoke rising from a hit site, people running in panic, and sirens blaring in the background. That clip could go viral in seconds and be used by Iran or its allies as propaganda to show the world how “successful” their attack was. Whether or not the damage was significant doesn’t matter. The emotional impact of such images can shape global opinions and rally support for further aggression..

Then there’s the issue of public panic. Seeing constant updates and visuals of missile impacts whether real or exaggerated can cause anxiety, fear, and even chaos among civilians. Israel wants to keep the population informed, yes, but not overwhelmed or frightened by graphic, unfiltered content circulating freely on social media.

" Israel has instructed the public not to publish or share the locations and footage of any of the hits from the retaliation barrage of missiles launched by Iran. Israel has done this before, including when it came to reporting the death toll from their battles with Hamas on their own side.

The government also forbade journalists from reporting freely inside the countrysomething many journalists see as an attempt to hide the truth. And now, Israel is doing it again.This instruction is clear proof that Israel does not want journalists or the media to cover the true extent of the damage Israel has sustained of war with IRAN and HAMAS inside the country".

Also, some missile strikes might reveal sensitive areas like military sites, strategic locations, or vulnerabilities in Israel’s defense systems (for example, a gap in the Iron Dome coverage). Broadcasting these weaknesses could encourage further targeted attacks. So it's not just about public safety it's about keeping vital information out of the wrong hands

You may also read "How Did Israel Know Exactly Where to Hit? Is Mossad Behind It?"

Israel also has a system of military censorship during times of national emergency. The goal is not to silence the press but to ensure that operational and tactical details aren’t leaked before the army has a chance to respond. This censorship is temporary and used only when necessary to protect national security..

In short, when Israel tells people not to post or share images or videos from missile strike locations, it’s not trying to hide from the world. It’s doing what any country under threat would do protect its people, deny useful info to the enemy, and control chaos before it spreads. In a world where every smartphone is a potential broadcast station, a media blackout is one of the last lines of defense

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Why Do Indonesians Celebrate Father’s Day in June? - Powered by Blogger

In Indonesia, Father's Day is not as widely celebrated or commercialized as it is in some Western countries, but it does exist. Father’s Day was first declared in Indonesia on 12 November 2006 by the Perkumpulan Putra Ibu Pertiwi (PPIP) in Solo, Central Java, to honor the role of fathers in the family and society.

The group wanted a balance since Mother's Day (Hari Ibu) is celebrated on 22 December, they felt fathers also deserved recognition. When you scroll through social media on the third Sunday of June, you’ll often see your Indonesian friends posting “Happy Father’s Day” messages. At first glance, this might seem confusing. Isn’t Indonesia’s Father’s Day in November? The short answer is yes, officially. But like many things in our digital world, tradition and influence often blend in unexpected ways.

A Brief History of Father's Day in Indonesia
Unlike Mother’s Day (which is celebrated on December 22 in Indonesia), Father's Day here is relatively new. It was officially declared on November 12, 2006, by an organization called Perkumpulan Putra Ibu Pertiwi (PPIP) in Surakarta, Central Java. This movement came from a desire to balance the appreciation shown to both parents. While Mother’s Day has been part of Indonesian culture for decades, many felt fathers also deserved their day in the spotlight.

" The PPIP organized poetry readings, contests, and family events to celebrate the first official Indonesian Father’s Day. Since then, November 12 has been marked as Hari Ayah Nasional, though it remains a quieter and more reflective holiday compared to its global counterparts."




The Influence of Global Media
So, why do Indonesians also celebrate Father's Day in June? The answer lies in global influence, especially from the United States, where Father’s Day is celebrated every year on the third Sunday of June. Thanks to Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms, Indonesians are constantly exposed to international holidays. We see hashtags, heartwarming messages, and photo tributes posted by people from around the world—including celebrities, influencers, and public figures.

Over time, this exposure has led to the informal adoption of the June celebration, especially among younger Indonesians and those active online. It’s now quite common to see “Happy Father’s Day” greetings popping up in June even if the official recognition doesn’t come until November.

Is It Wrong to Celebrate in June?
Not at all. While November 12 remains the formal Father’s Day in Indonesia, the June celebration has become a symbol of global connection. Some Indonesians choose to celebrate both dates: June for joining the international wave, and November to honor local tradition.

At the end of the day, what matters most is the sentiment. Whether it’s in June or November, taking the time to appreciate and acknowledge fathers their sacrifices, wisdom, and love is always worthwhile.

In My Opinion
Indonesia’s dual celebration of Father’s Day is a perfect example of how culture continues to evolve. As global and local customs blend, we gain more opportunities to reflect on the people who shape our lives. So whether you’re giving your dad a call in June or writing him a heartfelt letter in November, just remember: every day is a good day to say thank you to a father.

How do you celebrate Father's Day in your family?
Do you follow the global trend in June or honor the local tradition in November or maybe both? Share your thoughts, stories, or even a special message to your dad in the comments below! 

Don’t forget to share this article with friends and family to spread the love for all the amazing fathers out there no matter the date!

Follow me on

X (Twitter) :   AsepHaryonoIND
Intagram : asepharyono
Facebook : asepharyono
Youtube : /@AsepHaryonoINDONESIA

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Keseharian, Opinion - Asep Haryono | LinkedIn Premium Membership Offer – Should I Take or Leave It? - Powered by Blogger

Do you have an account on LinkedIn? I'm sure many of you do, or at least you've heard of the platform. For the past two years, I’ve been registered there to find jobs that match my skills. I resigned from my job back in 2013 as a Social Media Specialist at a local newspaper company in West Kalimantan Barat. Since then, I’ve been searching for job opportunities related to my experience in the social media field.

This is a screenshot to my actual Linkedin account at the moment. Just take a look a red circle I put there, that is an offer of Linkedin Premium Membership one-month free trial which I have not decided to take or leave it

Just yesterday, while checking my email, I received a message from LinkedIn offering me a special one-month free trial of LinkedIn Premium. They’ve noticed my recent activity posting articles on my blog rather than submitting job applications directly through their platform.

Let me share what LinkedIn Premium offers. Some key features include:
• Custom button: It allows me to guide profile viewers to take actions like visiting my website or signing up for a demo.
• InMail messages: I can reach out to anyone—even if we’re not connected—like peers, industry leaders, or potential partners.
• Company insights: This helps make better, data-driven decisions.
• Who’s viewed your profile: I can see who visited my profile over the past 365 days.

They said my free trial starts today.

Personally, I think this is a great opportunity to get more attention from companies and potential employers. It also increases the chances of my CV and current projects being noticed. However, despite these amazing features, I started to wonder how can I continue using this premium service beyond the free month without paying the subscription fee?

Why does LinkedIn still aim to make money from job seekers like me? I know it might sound like a silly question after all, in this world, almost nothing comes for free anymore.

What do you think about this offer?
Should I take it or leave it?
I’d love to hear your thoughts..

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | How Did Israel Know Exactly Where to Hit? Is Mossad Behind It? - Powered by Blogger

We cannot deny the reality that Israel's armed forces seem to already know their targets and have successfully destroyed them even in their underground hideouts. Many top commanders of Iran and Hamas have been precisely eliminated. My questions are: How did they know the exact locations of these hideouts?

Do you think Mossad agents have infiltrated behind enemy lines in Iran and Hamas, providing Israel with critical information on when, where, and how to launch these attacks so accurately?

.

It's All About the Intel
This kind of accuracy doesn’t happen by chance. Israel has one of the most advanced intelligence systems in the world. We're talking about real-time satellite surveillance, signal interception, cyber espionage, and yes, probably some serious spy-level infiltration. When you take out people hiding deep underground or moving in safe housesyou need very specific information. Like exact coordinates. Timing. Layout of the place. That doesn’t come from guesswork.

Mossad: The Shadow Warriors
Let’s not kid ourselves. When something this precise happens, people start pointing fingers at Mossad, Israel’s legendary intelligence agency. Mossad has a long history of pulling off incredible operations.

They've tracked and taken down terrorists and scientists all over the world from Tehran to Beirut to Berlin. If there’s one agency known for sneaking behind enemy lines and gathering information from the inside, it’s them. And if we're being honest?

It wouldn’t be a surprise at all if they already had agents planted deep within Iranian networks or Hamas command structures. Or maybe they turned someone on the inside a disgruntled fighter or even a high-ranking officer. Money talks. Fear talks. Revenge talks.

"Israel latest  attacks on the heart of Iran’s nuclear and military structure Friday and assault key facilities and kill top generals and scientists is latest briliant target which suspected by the information given by infiltration or spy agents in Iran. How did Israel know the exact location of the target precisely?. That make sense".



Cyber Spying and Drones Are Game Changers
But it's not just about human spies anymore. Israel also has world-class cyber units, like the famous Unit 8200, which can hack into enemy systems, listen to calls, read emails, track locations all without setting foot across the border. Pair that with high-flying drones and real-time satellite imagery, and suddenly you can monitor enemy movements 24/7. Build a bunker? They’ll know. Visit a secret hideout too many times? Tracked. Use a "burner phone"? Still tracked.

Technology has made it almost impossible to hide if you're being watched closely.

So, Was Mossad Involved?
Let’s be real. Almost definitely, yes.

Even if we’ll never see the proof in public, history tells us that Mossad is usually behind operations like this. They might not carry out the attacks themselves, but they supply the intel, the targets, and sometimes even help plan the whole operation from behind the scenes.

It’s their job to know where the enemies hide and clearly, they’re very good at it.

My Opinions
This is one of those moments where intelligence, technology, and strategy come together. And while war is tragic and painful, it’s hard not to be amazed at how precise modern warfare has become.

It also shows how much power lies in information. Sometimes, it's not the biggest army that wins it’s the side that knows the most about the other. So next time you see the news say, “Israel struck a high-value target hiding in an underground bunker,” just know: someone, somewhere, made sure that exact location was known. And it probably wasn’t by accident.


What Do You Think?
Do you believe Mossad has eyes and ears inside enemy lines? Have modern wars become less about soldiers and more about surveillance? 👉

Drop your thoughts in the comments below or share this article if you found it interesting.

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Double Standards in Western Media: - Powered by Blogger

It’s no secret that the media plays a powerful role in shaping how we view the world. But what happens when that role is twisted by bias, politics, and selective storytelling? What we get is a world where the same events are covered in drastically different ways depending on who’s involved and that’s the ugly truth behind double standards in Western media.

When violence erupts in different parts of the world, the reactions and headlines are rarely neutral. Instead, they reflect a deeply ingrained Western-centric narrative one that favors allies and demonizes rivals. The result? A lopsided view of global events that distorts the truth and devalues certain lives over others.

Take a close look at recent conflicts, and you’ll see what I mean.

When Russia invaded Ukraine, the outrage was immediate. Western leaders condemned the act as a war crime, and media outlets framed it as a brutal, unjustified invasion. Ukrainian civilians were portrayed rightfully as victims deserving global sympathy. Billions of dollars in military aid and humanitarian support flowed in, and reporters described the resistance as heroic.

Now contrast that with Israel’s military operations in Gaza. Thousands of Palestinians, including children, have died in repeated airstrikes. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble. And yet, media headlines often say, “Israel responds to Hamas attacks,” subtly justifying the violence as a defensive action. Civilians in Gaza rarely receive the same level of empathy or global support that Ukrainian civilians did. The narrative shifts from “invasion” to “security operations” even when the destruction is just as devastating.

And it doesn’t stop there.

Think back to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. Based on false intelligence about weapons of mass destruction, that war killed hundreds of thousands of people and destabilized an entire region. But in the eyes of much of the Western media, it was portrayed as a mission to spread democracy, not an illegal occupation. The same actions by another country today would be quickly condemned as imperialism.

Or consider Yemen, where a Saudi-led coalition with heavy backing from the West has waged a brutal war for years. Civilian casualties, famine, destroyed infrastructure it’s one of the worst humanitarian crises on the planet. And yet, how often do you see it trending? How often is it the headline story on Western news channels? Rarely, if ever. Why? Because Saudi Arabia is a strategic partner, and the Western media rarely bite the hand that funds or aligns with their governments.

Another revealing example is how freedom of speech is selectively defended. When a Western magazine publishes a cartoon mocking Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), it sparks outrage among Muslims around the world. For many, it’s a deeply offensive and hateful act. But the cartoonists are protected by law, defended by the media, and even guarded by police under the banner of “free speech.”

Now compare that to someone simply wearing a Palestinian flag in a peaceful protest. In several Western countries, police have stopped, questioned, or even arrested individuals for “disturbing public order” or “supporting terrorism” just for showing solidarity with Palestine. So insulting Islam is protected speech, but supporting a humanitarian cause is criminalized? That’s not freedom of expression it’s hypocrisy, plain and simple.

Even protest movements are framed differently. Demonstrations in places like Iran or Venezuela are praised as fights for freedom. But when similar protests happen in the U.S. or France, especially by marginalized groups, the coverage quickly focuses on violence, looting, or threats to order. The media chooses who gets to be the hero and who gets painted as a threat.

These double standards aren’t just unethical they’re dangerous. They fuel misinformation, justify unjust wars, and divide global empathy into categories of “worthy” and “unworthy.”

So what can we do? For starters, we need to diversify where we get our news. Read from both mainstream and independent sources, both Western and non-Western. Look at how the same story is covered in different regions. Ask critical questions: Who benefits from this version of the story? Who’s being silenced?

Because at the end of the day, if we want to build a more just and informed world, we can’t let media double standards go unchallenged. All human lives have equal value. And it’s time the headlines reflected that.

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Why Is the World So Afraid to Pressure Israel to Let Humanitarian Aids Into Gaza? - Powered by Blogger

Why Is the World So Afraid to Pressure Israel to Let Humanitarian Aid Into Gaza? I have one question that never be able to be answered properly regarding the situation in Gaza. We all know that the Israelis in conjunction with their arm forces will always blockade and seize all humanitarian aids enterin Gaza. People in Gaza need emergency assistance such as food, medicines etc. This is very dangerous they could be died of starvation or famine The world keep silence about this

My question is

Why does the world, including the United Nations, seem so afraid to strongly pressure Israel to open the blockade and allow full humanitarian aid into Gaza?

We all know what’s happening. Gaza is under siege. The Israeli military backed by its government has consistently blocked or limited the entry of essential supplies like food, clean water, medical aid, fuel, and emergency assistance. This isn’t just inconvenient; it’s deadly. People in Gaza are dying from hunger, thirst, lack of medicine, and the collapse of hospitals. The humanitarian crisis is real. And yet, the world mostly stays silent.

So why is this happening?
Why is the response so weak when the suffering is so obvious?
Let’s try to find out


Israel’s Strong Alliances, Especially with the U.S.
Israel is not just any country. It has powerful friends most notably, the United States. The U.S. gives billions of dollars in military aid to Israel and has defended it politically for decades. That matters, especially in the United Nations Security Council, where the U.S. has veto power.

Any time the UN tries to pass a resolution that criticizes Israel or demands action, the U.S. can block it—and often does. That makes it almost impossible for the UN to take strong, united action.

The UN Has No Real Power Without Support
It’s important to understand that the United Nations doesn’t have an army. It can issue warnings, reports, and even votes, but it can’t force a country to obey unless all the major world powers agree. And in this case, they don’t.

Even when UN agencies like UNRWA (which supports Palestinian refugees) or WHO try to send help, they often get blocked by Israeli authorities—or defunded due to political pressure.

Israel stops Gaza aid ship, detains Greta Thunberg and other activists
Image from CBS News

“Security” Is Always Used as an Excuse
Israel argues that the blockade is necessary to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas, the group that governs Gaza. Many Western countries accept this justification without question, even though it’s clear that millions of innocent civilians are suffering as a result.

This way of framing the crisis as a “security issue” rather than a humanitarian emergencyallows politicians to avoid action while pretending to be neutral.

Fear of Political Backlash
Governments around the world are often afraid to criticize Israel too strongly. Doing so could damage their relationships with the U.S., attract negative media attention, or lead to accusations of bias or even antisemitism—even when the criticism is focused on government policy, not religion or identity.

As a result, many leaders choose to stay quiet, issue mild statements, or call for “both sides” to de-escalate even when one side clearly holds most of the power.

" If the Israeli authorities claim that humanitarian aid could end up in the hands of Hamas, it’s completely ridiculous and unacceptable. They’re just making excuses.

These humanitarian aid convoys are guided by multiple international organizations and are closely monitored by journalists from around the world. So please, just stay silent".





Double Standards and Global Hypocrisy
Let’s be honest: The world does not treat all victims equally. When war broke out in Ukraine, support came fast and loud. Sanctions were imposed, military and humanitarian aid poured in, and the media was filled with nonstop coverage.

But when it comes to Gaza, the reaction is slower, weaker, and full of excuses. This double standard is rooted in politics, racism, and selective outrage. It's hard to accept—but it's the truth.

The people of Gaza are not asking for much. They want to live. They want to eat. They want medicine for their children and a chance to survive.

So why is the world afraid to demand that Israel open the blockade and allow humanitarian aid? Because power, politics, and fear are louder than justice right now.

But that doesn’t mean we should stay silent. As individuals, bloggers, writers, and citizens, we can raise our voices even when our leaders won’t. Speaking the truth is the least we can do when people are starving and the world chooses to look away.


UPDATE
I am happy to see that 1,000 activists from North Africa are not afraid to confront the Zionist regime. They bravely broke through the Israeli military blockade.

I truly appreciate the actions taken by these thousands of activists to deliver humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza, who are suffering from a deep crisis.

Thousands of them delivered food aid via land routes. Around 12 buses and 100 private cars were dispatched from the capital of Tunisia, Tunis, to Gaza on Monday, June 9th. Another group responded quickly hundreds of activists are now moving from Libya and Tunisia by land to deliver humanitarian assistance directly to Gaza.

If the world chooses not to care about what’s happening in Gaza, then let’s do it our own way. 

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | My Reaction to " "Trump sends Marines to Los Angeles, doubles number of National Guard as anti-ICE protests continue" on YouTube - Powered by Blogger

Hello to you. How is it going?.

I posted thus article at 07.36 am local time here in Indonesia/  Hopefully you and the whole of your family are in the best of health.  I have just watched one of the videos shared by Al Jazeera English regading the clash between Protestester and Police in Los Angeles.  I have my own opinion aboout what unfolded

 the U.S. President Overstep in the LA Riots? Lately, I watched a powerful video about the recent riots in Los Angeles. It showed angry crowds, clashing with police, and chaos in the streets. What caught my attention most was the fact that the President of the United States didn’t send the National Guard to help calm things down. At first, I thought, “Why not? Isn’t that their job?” But the more I dug into it, the more I realized it’s not that simple.

Trump sends Marines to Los Angeles, doubles number of National Guard as anti-ICE protests continue
Image from Al Jazeera English

Let me break it down for you in plain terms.

Who's Actually in Charge of the National Guard?
You might think the President has all the power when it comes to the military, and that's true but only up to a point. The National Guard is like a special team that answers to both the state governor and the federal government. Think of it like a teenager with two parents: sometimes the state (governor) is in charge, and sometimes the federal parent (President) steps in.

"Without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom, United States President Donald Trump ordered nearly 5,000 troops to the state. U.S. law strictly regulates the deployment of troops for civil affairs domestically..

If a state like California wants help during a natural disaster or civil unrest, the governor can call up the National Guard. But the President can also send them in with or without the state’s blessing if things get really bad. That’s where the debate begins The mobilization of the National Guard triggers accusations that Trump bypassed the law

Do you think the President Do the Right Thing?
In this case, it seems the President chose not to interfere, which surprised many people. Some say it was a smart move keeping the federal government out of local issues and avoiding more tension. Others see it as weak leadership, allowing violence to spread while innocent people and businesses suffered.

But here’s the twist: if the President had sent in troops without the governor’s request, it might have looked like political harassment or an abuse of power. After all, the U.S. is built on federalism which means local issues should be handled by local leaders unless there’s no other choice.


Is It Legal for the President to Send Troops Anyway?
Yes, under a very old law called the Insurrection Act of 1807, the President can send in troops if there's a rebellion or if state leaders can't control the situation. So technically, it’s not illegal. But let’s be honest it’s a risky move that can create more problems than it solves.

Imagine troops rolling through Los Angeles streets while people are protesting injustice. That could make things worse, not better.


My Take on the Whole Situation
To be honest, I don’t think there’s a perfect answer here. If the President stays out, people blame him for doing nothing. If he steps in, people accuse him of being a dictator. This is the reality of leadership in a democracy especially one as complex as the United States.

Personally, I think the President tried to avoid making a bad situation worse. But that also means the pressure is on the local government to handle things effectively. If they don’t, people lose faith in the system and that’s dangerous.

My Thoughts on Federal Power vs. Local Control
This whole situation makes me wonder: how should governments respond to crisis? Do we want fast action, even if it means stepping on local toes? Or careful decision-making, even if it takes more time?

No matter which side you’re on, one thing is clear violence and chaos aren’t the answer. What we need are open conversations, responsible leadership, and long-term solutions that go beyond just sending in troops.

Thanks for reading. What’s your take? Let me know in the comments..

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Why the World Seems Powerless to Stop Israel’s Genocide in Gaza - Powered by Blogger

The images coming out of Gaza are heartbreaking bombed-out homes, lifeless children, grieving families. It’s impossible to ignore the sheer scale of suffering. And yet, the global community governments, institutions, and world leaders remain largely silent or ineffective. Why does the world seem so powerless, or even unwilling, to stop Israel’s brutal campaign against Palestinians? .

The Shield of U.S. Support At the core of this issue is the United States. As Israel’s most powerful ally, the U.S. provides billions in military aid, advanced weapons, and perhaps most importantly diplomatic protection.

The U.S. has repeatedly used its veto at the UN Security Council to block resolutions that criticize Israel or call for ceasefires. Without global consensus, institutions like the UN are left paralyzed. As long as Washington continues to defend Israeli actions, meaningful accountability is nearly impossible.

The UN and ICC Are Toothless Many people ask, “Why doesn’t the UN or the International Criminal Court (ICC) do something?” The sad truth is that these bodies lack enforcement power especially when powerful countries refuse to cooperate. .

The ICC has launched investigations into possible war crimes in Gaza, but these processes take years. Meanwhile, people are dying today. Justice, if it ever arrives, comes far too late. .

Double Standards in International Law The world condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine almost instantly, imposing sanctions, offering weapons, and rallying support. But when it comes to Gaza, there’s hesitation, excuses, and vague statements about “both sides.” This is the hypocrisy of Western foreign policy: human rights are defended selectively, based on political convenience, not moral principles

" The President of the Republic of Indonesia, Prabowo Subianto, while delivering a speech to the Turkish Parliament on Thursday, April 10, 2025, stated that although many countries advocate for democracy and human rights, they remain silent in the face of atrocities in Gaza, Palestine.

He pointed out that when children are bombed, innocent mothers are killed, and the people of Gaza lose everything, many nations turn a blind eye and act as if these are not violations of human rights.. ".




Media Narratives Shape Public Silence Mainstream Western media often frames the violence as a “conflict” rather than what it is a lopsided assault. Israel’s actions are repeatedly described as “self-defense,” while Palestinian suffering is minimized or blamed on Hamas. When the media fails to show the full truth, public opinion is manipulated. And when the public doesn’t demand justice, politicians feel no pressure to act. .

Criticism of Israel Is Politically Dangerous In many Western countries, speaking out against Israel’s policies can be risky. Critics are often accused of antisemitism even when their comments are about human rights, not religion or race. This tactic has created a chilling effect. Many leaders and activists stay quiet out of fear, while Palestinians pay the price. .

Arab and Muslim Countries Are Divided While many Arab nations express outrage, their actions rarely go beyond statements. Egypt and Jordan maintain peace deals with Israel. Some, like Saudi Arabia, have even moved toward normalization. This lack of unity and collective pressure from the Muslim world has further emboldened Israel’s actions. .

Calling It Genocide Has Legal Consequences The word “genocide” carries legal weight. If world leaders officially acknowledge that a genocide is taking place, they are legally obligated to act under international law. So instead, they avoid the word — not because they disagree, but because they don’t want to take responsibility. .

Summarize

What’s happening in Gaza is not just a tragedy it’s a test of our shared humanity. The world’s silence isn’t due to ignorance. It’s a product of geopolitical power, strategic alliances, media control, and moral failure. .

History will judge us. And silence, in moments like this, is complicity. 

---

A Message From Asep Haryono

 

"Thank you so much for your time here. I really appreciate your precious moment here as well.  Please leave any comment down below.  Let me hear from you.  Greetings from Indonesia"

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Indonesia, the World’s Only Tropical Paradise (Well, Almost!) - Powered by Blogger

I added “(Well, Almost!)” to the title to keep the tone playful and engaging, while also gently acknowledging that the claim “Indonesia is the world’s only tropical paradise” is bold and slightly exaggerated
.
Here’s why my friends :

First, It catches attention: The strong original statement grabs readers, and the small parenthetical note adds a wink  like saying, “we know there are other tropical paradises, but let us show you why Indonesia stands out.”

Second, It keeps my tone casual and friendly, rather than overly nationalistic or dismissive of other countries and third It invites curiosity: Readers may wonder, Why is it “almost” the only one? and feel encouraged to read more. That said, if I want to stick with the full bold title no qualifiers I can absolutely rewrite or tweak the article. 

Let’s just say it loud and proud, Indonesia is the world’s only tropical paradise. Okay, okay, maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration (we see  Maldives and Hawaii), but if you’ve ever set foot in Indonesia, you’ll understand why this bold statement doesn’t feel too far from the truth.

Beautiful tropical beach in Indonesia with clear blue water and palm trees

This country is truly something else. Picture this: over 17,000 islands, each with its own charm. From the world-famous beaches of Bali, to the untouched beauty of Raja Ampat, to the cultural richness of Java, Indonesia feels like a highlight reel of everything you'd ever want in a tropical escape. You want white sand beaches? Got it. Lush rainforests? Check. Coral reefs that look like something out of a Pixar movie? Absolutely.

But it’s not just the landscapes that make Indonesia special. It’s the people. Warm, welcoming, and always smiling, Indonesians make you feel like you’re home even if you’re thousands of miles away from where you were born. The hospitality here is not forced or transactional; it’s genuine. You can ask someone for directions and end up being invited to a family meal. That’s just how it goes.

And let’s talk about the food for a second because wow. From the spicy kick of rendang, to the comforting simplicity of nasi goreng, and the sweet delight of es cendol, your taste buds will be on a never-ending roller coaster (the good kind). You could spend a whole month just eating your way through the archipelago and still not scratch the surface of what Indonesian cuisine has to offer.

What also makes Indonesia stand out is its diversity not just in landscapes or food, but in culture. It’s home to hundreds of ethnic groups and languages, each with their own traditions, dances, music, and stories. Whether you're watching a Balinese Kecak dance at sunset, exploring ancient temples like Borobudur and Prambanan, or just chatting with locals in a village somewhere in Sulawesi, you’re constantly reminded that this country is more than just a pretty beach. It’s a living, breathing cultural mosaic.

Of course, like any paradise, Indonesia isn’t perfect. Yes, we have traffic. Yes, some places can get a bit too touristy. But even with its flaws, it somehow manages to remain charming. Maybe that’s part of its magic.

So, is Indonesia really the world’s only tropical paradise? I must say its technically no. But emotionally? Spiritually? Culturally? For many of us who’ve experienced its magic, the answer is a big, tropical YES.

Have you ever visited Indonesia or plan to someday?

"Share your favorite tropical destination in the comments and if you loved this read, don’t forget to share it with fellow travel lovers!

Tag : Keseharian, Opinion - Asep Haryono | My reaction to “Anarchy in LA: Hundreds of soldiers, officers and protesters clash | 9 News Australia” video on Youtube - Powered by Blogger

Hello to you. How is it going? When I posted this article, the time is now in my area is about 23.37 pm in Indonesia.  Its getting late here.  I manage myself to stop and call it a day usually before middle of the night.   How about you?

You may have seen the movie Battle: Los Angeles, which portrays a war between the American military and extraterrestrial invaders trying to take over the city. However, what is currently happening in Los Angeles is very different it is not a battle against aliens. Since Friday night, a wave of demonstrations and clashes has erupted in the city following a large-scale operation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In this operation, over 100 people were arrested for alleged immigration violations, sparking public outrage.

Tensions escalated further after US President Donald Trump decided to deploy approximately 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles without a request from California Governor Gavin Newsom. The unrest began with ICE raids and quickly escalated into protests and arrests. The demonstrations intensified after ICE agents conducted raids at several locations across Los Angeles, including a warehouse in the Fashion District and stores such as Home Depot and Dale’s Donuts.

According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), at least 118 people were arrested during the operation, including five individuals suspected of ties to criminal organizations. In response to the rising tensions on the streets, President Trump signed a memorandum on Saturday night authorizing the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles under “Title 10”authority.

Los Angeles is on fire literally and figuratively. What began as federal immigration raids quickly escalated into full-blown street clashes involving hundreds of protesters, officers, and National Guard troops. But this isn't just about a riot. It's about something deeper a clash of values, identities, and the very meaning of democracy..

The image taken from 9 News Youtube Channel

.

What Sparked the Fire? .
When federal agents carried out aggressive immigration raids in LA, Compton, and Paramount, the message was clear: “We’re in control.” But the community pushed back. Hundreds poured into the streets, shouting not just for immigrants' rights but for human rights. The response? Tear gas. Rubber bullets. Soldiers on patrol. .
.
Some say the protests turned violent. Others say the crackdown was violence from the start. Either way, this is not normal. .
.
The Federal Power Move.Deploying National Guard troops without the state’s consent was like pouring gasoline on an already burning fire. President Trump defended it as restoring law and order. But California’s Governor and LA’s Mayor called it unconstitutional. And they’re right to be worried. This isn’t just about border control. It’s about where federal power ends and where state rights begin. .
.
When the Press Gets Shot. Even journalists weren’t safe. A news reporter got hit by a rubber bullet while going live on air. That’s not just a stray incident it’s a chilling warning. If the press can’t report freely, who holds power accountable? .

"That’s a powerful and intense situation  in Los Angeles definitely much more than just a riot,  It touches on deep social and political fractures, identities, and questions about democracy itself.

Regarding Indonesia, while the context and specifics are different, Indonesia has experienced moments of social and political unrest that carry some similarities". 

.

Who Pays the Price? .
It’s not the politicians in suits. It’s the people on the ground immigrants fearful of deportation, families caught in curfews, students missing school, and small businesses watching their windows shatter. Violence solves nothing. But silence fixes even less. .

My Take. Los Angeles is screaming. Are we listening? .
.
This isn’t about being pro-immigration or anti-immigration. It’s about how we deal with disagreement in a democratic society. Are we willing to talk, vote, debate or do we jump straight to flash grenades and riot shields? .Let LA be a warning but also a wake-up call. Because if freedom, dialogue, and dignity can collapse in one city, they can collapse anywhere. .

What’s your take on what’s happening in LA? Drop your thoughts in the comments and share this post if you believe in peaceful change

Bye for now.  I wanna hit the sack.

---

Tag : Opinion - Asep Haryono | Why is Israel untouchable and seemingly above the law on the global stage? - Powered by Blogger

Why does Israel seem to act with impunity? Why does it feel like the country is above international law? You're not alone in wondering this. These are fair questions, and they come up often in political discussions, especially during times of war or occupation. Let’s unpack this topic in a simple and straightforward way.

First, The Power of Strong Allies – Especially the U.S. First and foremost, Israel’s close relationship with the United States is a huge factor. The U.S. gives Israel around $3.8 billion in military aid every year. On top of that, the U.S. frequently uses its veto power at the United Nations to block resolutions that are critical of Israel. This has happened dozens of times over the years. .

When you have a superpower in your corner, you're naturally shielded from a lot of global pressure. It’s like having the biggest player on your football team defending you at all times—people will think twice before calling a foul. .

Second, Historical Context and the Holocaust Israel was established in 1948, just a few years after the Holocaust, where six million Jews were murdered. This horrific event left a lasting mark on the world’s conscience, and global sympathy for the Jewish people played a major role in the founding of Israel. .

As a result, many countries in the West remain careful about how they criticize Israel, worried about being labeled antisemitic or disrespectful of historical trauma. While criticizing government policy is not the same as being antisemitic, the line is often blurred in international discussions. .

Third, A Key Player in a Volatile Region The Middle East is a region full of tension, with conflicts in Syria, threats from Iran, and the presence of militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. In this chaotic environment, Israel is seen as a stable and strong ally by Western powers especially the United States. .

Because of this strategic role, many countries prioritize diplomacy and cooperation with Israel over confronting it on issues like the occupation of Palestinian territories or human rights violations. .

Fourth, The UN Can Condemn, But That’s About It You might see headlines like “UN Condemns Israeli Attacks” or “UN Votes Against Settlements,” but most of these actions come from the UN General Assembly, and they’re non-binding. They express global opinion, but they can’t enforce punishment. .

The UN Security Council is the body that can take meaningful action, but again, the U.S. often blocks these efforts with a veto. So in practice, there are few international consequences for Israeli actions. .

Fifth, Legal Loopholes and Diplomatic Games Israel often disputes the authority or fairness of international bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC) or UN Human Rights Council. Sometimes, these organizations are accused of being biased, and Israel refuses to cooperate with their investigations or rulings. .

Israeli and American flags waving side by side with a military tank in the background, symbolizing strong military and political alliance

This legal standoff means that, even if there’s a ruling against Israel, there’s no real way to enforce it. And without enforcement, the perception of impunity only grows stronger.
 .

Do you think that the unwavering military and political supports for Israel from the US and its allies play a vital role to make Israel so strong and feel above the law? .

Yes, absolutely,

The unwavering military and political support from the United States and its key allies plays a crucial role in making Israel both militarily strong and, in many eyes, appear above the law. .

Here’s why: Military Strength Backed by Billions The U.S. sends about $3.8 billion per year in military aid to Israel, making it one of the largest recipients of U.S. foreign aid. This includes: Cutting-edge weapons systems,Missile defense (like the Iron Dome), Intelligence and cyber security cooperation.

This unmatched support gives Israel a major military advantage in the region. Few neighboring countries can challenge Israel without risking massive retaliation. .

"In January and May 2024, the ICJ issued legally binding orders for Israel to stop killing civilians, allow humanitarian aid, and prevent genocidal acts.
Unfortunately the court didn't yet use the final legal ruling "genocide" , and Israel blocked humanitaria aids enter Gaza which cause badly famine. Starvation can not be accepted as part of a weapon in combat.
The world is silence. The UN can not do anything  That is why Israel is above the law. Nothing in this world can stop Israel which back up by the US and its ally.  Only GOD can fix them all". 



What Is Your Opinion?
Whether you support Israel or are critical of its policies, one thing is clear: the country operates with more protection and fewer consequences than many others would in similar situations. This is due to a combination of historical context, powerful allies, strategic importance, and legal gray areas in international law. .

It's a complicated issue, and everyone sees it through a different lens. But asking these questions, understanding the dynamics, and encouraging honest conversations are key steps toward global accountability no matter where you stand. .

What’s your take?
Do you think global support has gone too far—or is it justified? Share your thoughts in the comments below and let’s start an honest conversation.